We pride ourselves on our quality of service. SATISFACTION GUARANTEED, or your money back. Learn more here.
ARCHIVES
A Dallas district court judge granted a motion for new trial in case involving a motor vehicle accident and drunk driver who was driving someone else’s vehicle. The decision came after a $1.5 million Plaintiff verdict and after persistent efforts by the vehicle owner’s legal team.
A case involving alleged negligence and fraud has concluded in a ‘confidential settlement’ following a year-plus battle of Plaintiffs attempting to compel Defendants’ net worth documents.
The Bradfield jury returned a verdict that reflected it did NOT believe the majority of Amazon’s contentions, including Amazon’s claim to not have control over the driver, Amazon’s driver’s side of the story, and Amazon’s affirmative defenses accusing the parents involved of poor supervision.
Challenging, complex litigation cases compel all parties to bring their A game and fight hard for the outcome they want, resulting in highly competitive lawyering and producing valuable, transferable skills.
Despite putting forth a decent effort for their client, Plaintiff’s attorneys undermined their case-in-chief in observable ways. This article discusses some of Plaintiff’s faux pas, big and small.
The Santana jury reasonably applied what they heard in trial to the letter of the jury instructions in determining that they could not find the Virginia Slims cigarettes were defectively designed.